Clinton on Estrogen Calls Giuliani "Bush on Steroids"

Courtesy of Rolling Stone

Classic Example of the Democrat Leadership's Evil.

I read this this morning and had my breath taken away. Such an admission of their malfeasance is stunning given trained politicians are normally better at deceit.

Money-graph:

Many Democrats have anticipated that, at best, Petraeus and U.S. ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker would present a mixed analysis of the success of the current troop surge strategy, given continued violence in Baghdad. But of late there have been signs that the commander of U.S. forces might be preparing something more generally positive. Clyburn said that would be "a real big problem for us." [Emphasis mine]

Think about that...American success and a positive analysis are bad for Democrats. It makes one wonder why the Democrats are so anxious to have their constituents killed. Or, in light of the ongoing scandals, how much they're making off of it.

It proves one thing though. When Democrats say they're supporting the troops...they are. Al Qaeda's.

Sony has no plans to cut Playstation 3 price...

It's only part of the headline. Reuters left off the ...so consumers have no plans to increase purchases. Anyways, I'm sure Nintendo appreciates Sony's gesture.

Sony VAIO customer service, Jane Galt's experience.

For all of you dreading customer service, take a gander at Sony's ineptitude. Sheesh, they're almost as bad as Congress' phone bank.

David Gross, selfish child.

Here's an article on David Gross, a selfish moron who refuses to pay taxes because he doesn't support the war. Okay, I'll play ball. How about everyone who realizes that Social Security is a Ponzi Scheme opt out? What about NEA, and NPR, etc?

"They're showing the terrorists that America is not committed," Ubaldi said.

Mr. Ubaldi is wrong, as is Gross. This shows the terrorists that they need to keep murdering civilians and kids...because morons like Gross, Ubaldi, and the rest are willing to surrender to them.

The only way terrorists can win is by the home-front surrendering. And too many seem to want that.

Obama Denounces Current Politics

In his statement today Obama said the following:

"This decision to commute the sentence of a man who compromised our national security cements the legacy of an Administration characterized by a politics of cynicism and division, one that has consistently placed itself and its ideology above the law. This is exactly the kind of politics we must change so we can begin restoring the American people's faith in a government that puts the country's progress ahead of the bitter partisanship of recent years."

I, for one, am glad that Obama has come out and demanded a serious sentence for Sandy Berger. To think that a man like Berger would willingly commit a felony by stealing classified documents and destroy them yet face no penalty shows the decay in our system.

Oh, wait...Obama was decrying the partial clemency for the victim of Nifong-esque witch hunt? Guess the 'politics of cynicism and division' are alive in well in the Barrack Barack.

Traitor speaks...

Reading the words of this moron makes you wonder how you can live in a world where up is down. Orwell would love the modern Rosannacrats.

Then again, her post is high comedy considering she's one of the few creatures on the planet to make Bush look like Stephen Hawking.

Despinning the Media - Reuters and Statistics.

Reading about Sarkozy's victory in France this morning and I came across this "women and children hardest hit" piece from the "news" organization Reuters. It's the woe story of how a female candidate got shuned by female voters...classic Lefty identity politics.

Gehmlich's failure to grasp math comes to light in this passage:

Only 48 percent of women voted for Royal, according to an Ipsos poll conducted on election day on Sunday, while 52 percent supported rightist rival and overall winner Nicolas Sarkozy.

Horrible, isn't it? A 4% difference. How did Sarkozy pull off such a coup? Well, this story shows the winning percentages as

Sarkozy, a pro-American conservative and an immigrant's son, defeated Socialist Segolene Royal by 53.06 percent to 46.94 percent with an 85 percent voter turnout, according to final results released early Monday.

So, wait a second. Royal got 48% of the female vote and 47% overall...that means she pulled more women, relative to her vote, than Sarkozy. Truthfully, it's a statistically meaningless difference, but Reuters always puts their agenda ahead of facts so don't be surprised.

The real story that you can take from this is French voters voted on issues, on jobs, and items dear to France. Not on the smear-identity politics the fuels the Left.